From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 01:43:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F40916A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29B43D1D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) i5O1gNGO072588; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.2/meer) with ESMTP id i5O1gMWM075529; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.12.1/8.12.10) id i5O1gMqO075526; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 From: Joe Rhett To: "Karl M. Joch" Message-ID: <20040624014222.GB74718@meer.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Karl M. Joch" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Meer.net LLC cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 -0000 > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug > Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails > forwarding them to a Notes server. I would use RAID 0+1 or just plain RAID 0 since these should be cookie-cutter. -- Joe Rhett Senior Systems Engineer Meer.net