From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 29 23:56:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E8437B401 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-106-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.106.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D968343E9C for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:56:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A5966BE3; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:56:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C20E512F1; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:56:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:56:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tim Kellers Cc: Kris Kennaway , Tim Kellers , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wxgtk fails Message-ID: <20021130075633.GA41274@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20021129155701.R87468-100000@serv1.wallnet.com> <20021130002705.GA38347@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200211292152.07044.timothyk@wallnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211292152.07044.timothyk@wallnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 09:52:06PM -0500, Tim Kellers wrote: > I ftp'd the same package to my workstation here at home and pkg_add'ed it= as=20 > well, it also installed and complained about the version of some=20 > dependencies. That's to be expected. > I don't have any stale dependencies --I'm sure of that. Is it possible = that=20 > something in the newer versions of the dependencies that wxgtk-2.2.9 (the= =20 > package) was complaining about is preventing portupgrade from building th= e=20 > port? No, because bento rebuilds everything from scratch, and wxgtk *does* build on such a clean system. > And if it is, how the heck do I tell what might be the offending=20 > culprit? Beyond going over your system carefully to remove stale files, I don't have any easy ideas. Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE96G8xWry0BWjoQKURAhfwAJ0TFI5nRvnF6d4LMjHbPCPNEZ0tegCfXt04 cswmEv8u8mba34/IEpO++qQ= =aFO1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message