From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 15 15:34:28 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA18703 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:34:28 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA18695 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:34:24 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA07815; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:34:06 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199505152234.PAA07815@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Some makefile patches to stop the !#^%!& include files being touched To: peter@haywire.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 15:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Peter Wemm" at May 16, 95 06:23:35 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1690 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > On Mon, 15 May 1995, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > These were done from a very recent -current.. I got sick of the include > > > files being touched, causing make to rebuild the entire system again. > > > > > > Most of the makefiles were fixed, but these two slipped through: > > > > This is a very small band aid for a much larger problem which I will start > > in on fixing as soon as 2.0.5 is out the door. > > You are not wrong there.. Reinstalling the static libs causes a relink ^^^^^ Ignore my previous message, or it least a the fragment about me being right, I missed the ``not'' in this sentence, reading to damn fast and to much coffee today. I am going away for a few hours now to bury my head in the sand (good excuse to go to the beach!). > in /bin and /sbin (among others). I dont mind a relink anywhere as much > as a recompile-the-entire-system because I forgot to reapply the patches > after sup kindly "repaired" them for me. > > Damn. What a problem! :-) Having recently come from a binary-only > system, the last thing I should be griping about is recompiling the > source... :-) :-) > > Seriously though.. I suspect that a "cmp -s" will fail for many > static libs, merely because of the "ranlib" or "ranlib -t" after the > install.. even though they are otherwise identical. > > Cheers, > -Peter > > > -- > > Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com > > Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD > > > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD