Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 20:56:55 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: me@gw.muc.ditec.de Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An ISP's Wishlist... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960219205021.3144A@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <m0toX1L-000Pa6C@tartufo.muc.ditec.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Michael Elbel wrote: > In lists.freebsd.hackers you write: > > >David Muir Sharnoff stands accused of saying: > >> > >> It would be very nice to be able to have a separate configuration for > >> each port that named might bind to. There are times when I want to > >> serve different information to different nets. This is particularly > >> handy when building firewalls. > > >That definitely falls into "you have the source" 8) > > I've done this, it wasn't too difficult. I'm now running three > nameds on our firewall bastion, one to serve the inside network > with everything on the outside hidden and a wildcard MX-record > pointing to the mail relay machine, one to serve the outside > with all internall stuff hidden and an MX-record also pointing > to the mail relay and a third listening on 127.0.0.1 for the > bastion itself that has info about both the in- and the outside. > > Works like a charm. If there's enough interest, I can make that > available. > > Michael > > -- > Michael Elbel, DITEC, Muenchen, Germany - me@muc.ditec.de > Fermentation fault (coors dumped) > It would be really useful. Perhaps times will come when people port things *from* FreeBSD? Cheers, Sander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960219205021.3144A>