From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 24 14:12:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02504 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA02307 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03835; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199804242111.OAA03835@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Jason C. Wells" cc: Frank Pawlak , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: Andreessen: Linux use growing In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:16:01 PDT." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3831.893452295.1@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:11:35 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nope , andreesen is at fault here and some one should politely point out to him that yes we do exist and that there is a lot of sinergy going on between the free unices. My take on this situation is that if don't complaint he probably feels that we don't mind if are not mentioned . Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message