From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jul 19 07:27:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA28365
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 07:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA28354
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 07:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA19453; Fri, 19 Jul 96 16:32:36 +0100
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 96 16:32:36 +0100
Message-Id: <9607191532.AA19453@cabri.obs-besancon.fr>
From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr>
To: imp@village.org
Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607181707.LAA01169@rover.village.org> (message from Warner
	Losh on Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:07:23 -0600)
Subject: Re: Review request: x11/XFree86 port cleanup
X-Mailer: Emacs
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> Warner Losh writes:

 > :  * Patch below (untested!)
 > The below patch assumes X11R6.  Now that R6.1 is out, does that change
 > things?

The kerberos patches do not work with R6.1 (there are a few
rejects). I have an upgraded port for R6.1/XFree86-3.1.2C (w/o k4
patches) but I only did a compile/install and I never ran it. I prefer
to wait the next release from the XF86 people, since this version goes
in /usr/X11R6.1 and implies some changes in bsd.port.mk.

 > Warner

Jean-Marc
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Jean-Marc Zucconi       Observatoire de Besancon       F 25010 Besancon cedex
                   PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr
 =============================================================================