Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:44:43 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugzilla messages about issues related to freebsd-ports, freebsd-multimedia, ... Message-ID: <20200711144443.91cff096a810c6e30da4babf@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20200711134110.GA4973@c720-r342378> References: <20200711112755.GA3908@c720-r342378> <20200711113510.GQ1462@albert.catwhisker.org> <20200711134110.GA4973@c720-r342378>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:41:10 +0200 Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > I know, and then the question is: why as MAINTAINER a full discussion(!) > mailing list is used? When there is no maintainer the most relevant mailing list is used, which, I suppose, serves to attract the attention of a pool of possible maintainers. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200711144443.91cff096a810c6e30da4babf>