From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 5 8:17: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from arb.arb.za.net (arb.arb.za.net [196.7.148.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9EF37B403 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 08:16:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by arb.arb.za.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with UUCP id f75FFCQ41214; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 17:15:12 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.za (8.11.5/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f75AHlZ01784; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 11:17:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200108051017.f75AHlZ01784@grimreaper.grondar.za> To: Ollivier Robert Cc: "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: ntpd 4.1 References: <20010805021216.B89877@tara.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <20010805021216.B89877@tara.freenix.org> ; from Ollivier Robert "Sun, 05 Aug 2001 02:12:16 +0200." Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 11:17:46 +0100 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > According to Mark Murray: > > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? > > I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 > based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly > recent option. > > AUTOKEY should be enough. Any objection? No objection from me :-) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message