From owner-freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Wed Mar 4 18:46:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBF9275BEF for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james.wright@jigsawdezign.com) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48XjWh1T0pz4KLl for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james.wright@jigsawdezign.com) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([82.18.193.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.179]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M27ix-1j763R1ngX-002aeI; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:46:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: ukbd key repeat behaviour changed? From: James Wright In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:46:03 +0000 Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <39CDAF5F-739E-4003-B1E3-B00222BD37DF@jigsawdezign.com> References: <8FF6BA04-2216-4FF4-AF6F-9310F9516C1B@jigsawdezign.com> <1bc72129-83e5-ced7-b04a-8b374a950c86@selasky.org> <5523FE74-80F8-404C-AE10-A2CDA3D35E7D@jigsawdezign.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yBSvD9UJhg976zAni8I00+ot3UCLRvpz5Mdo5ouowCwkhsF38DA NnQqoqE974MBXmsZNdqU6wycVpm5oCDXfvKn3Z0MTZFdv/iaVHFeYP75faNxKov/BgTMJpr +34pJSuhMVPfwkdq3eymIQZvd8q9noOt91Ac8/GK+9OIVvL1icVR4yc4cbLm40iR3ESpx0P b3sSrNk3JlSbvl8u4PsdA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:eY6UpakM260=:Qu6CF0FgIkP2jb0JX0uPba k6tsdQHO936MWYfyt9LLW8iz4XbqZHOTp+COUnTntl7ia4HjpNwucQKaFz/S9p+Hp5kKDmait VAkWOYA+yA2emLp3ff+UCVyRGl3ZsKt6vz5dXmbB8GMWR4t5iJRfRKYW5Be2DjdKuC71CUVhE qtrzhhj+SzhSMf3PKZWbgmv6U3MxfDvN/S04a9sbYNX1M+tl9Yd9F+nAHFAroSU8/d2JDWaLC 2i2qlx8Sma+AGJJlzhxqE+FW5oFNmdwoZZUc0aToZo/w/9U7886AFSLtZzseiqDZixLYy5c33 CVF8sVJKWHSVKXgjZcBtw6Q152DiXr8yTiCt27mXDwDZCauJUnHrkLEuS2lBQ8caa63H3y524 Zmp6RCEBlkESHDCsbdNNKXxG1h16at/m5eKJQWij5Q9DVXMEE9V89aV3zquoxTnPdg50nQ+Sn j4HQlsNivR3kGdHxVEKuf8iud0J3ImhceI4T+JrXkDXgc7XZf+FfthSwL8Wnsxrz2PC71chli rqL/bVvigo3vYu4Imexa0E8gwZpHZYe7nAG+WzZb5Sl++7uONjkgW7HJ27pU5ynjdJbEU5DYy UhuHFbuM1RTJQu7spKutwwrtI81l5zpTYD9dq1rXwdNW7CYVrWIj5PNBNlZapcdycglEyzK8S L9tC/SVtj1BlaS8dmem0YfhDGSrG6xa3zG2wFVwv0sIBl6YcpXJhXUkkzloZlyjAOyhOaURUF GKlEMIZl/xdIBtrknZ05Da25uVciBL0RfzIzS7dOxfxV+g/vh93Ja9OXN+k5r+zYu6xgAuvXm 3vQAOkipw6oPvwRf/6+1m1Gfhwrbgnz8z+Eb4l43AG8jg/9HbRtsdjiSImW1UhOpdTP+EnP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48XjWh1T0pz4KLl X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of james.wright@jigsawdezign.com has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.24) smtp.mailfrom=james.wright@jigsawdezign.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.95 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(0.16)[ip: (-0.23), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.12), asn: 8560(2.17), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[jigsawdezign.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.19)[0.185,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[24.17.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.20)[0.203,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:46:10 -0000 > On 4 Mar 2020, at 08:49, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >=20 >> However, to confirm it's not just my typing, I booted into my old = kernel (r357365) and I don't see the issue as in the newer revision = (r358484). >> I think it may be something to do with the latest version not = resetting the initial repeat delay when another key is pressed, e.g. >> 1) Hold down the 'a' key. >> 2) Wait a split second just before the 'a' key should start = repeating, and press 'l' key whilst still holding the 'a' key. >> 3) There should be a renewed initial delay before the 'l' key starts = repeating, but I think it starts repeating almost immediately (as if it = were still counting from the press of the 'a' key). >> Hope that makes some sense! :-) >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Can you try the attached patch? >=20 > Does it solve the issue? >=20 > --HPS > Thanks for the patch!=20 Is there any way of easily testing it without rebuilding the whole = kernel, as ukbd seems built in by default? Thanks, James=