Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ccc vs. libtool Message-ID: <9991p4$24n3$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> References: <998i08$voq$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20010320161950.A42275@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I'm writing this to background music played by a completely > > ccc-compiled Ogg Vorbis player... > > Put that binary up somewhere! :-) Actually, all you need to do is install a patched libtool and build the audio/vorbis meta port with CC=ccc. (Well, I have already applied PRs 25941 and 25942 here, but that shouldn't affect building with ccc.) Due to some braindead CFLAGS munging "-fast" doesn't get through; yet another patch to come. I intend to compare CPU usages between executables built with "ccc -fast" and gcc. Alas, vorbis encoding is broken on alpha in 1.0beta4. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9991p4$24n3$1>