From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 07:02:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC3316A400; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BDB13C428; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C511747B; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l18726MF003993; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:02:06 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Nate Lawson From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:29:59 PST." <45CA60F7.4000507@root.org> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:02:06 +0000 Message-ID: <3992.1170918126@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Marcel Moolenaar , Robert Watson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC src/sys/arm/conf EP80219 src/sys/conf NOTES files files.powerpc options src/sys/geom geom_apple.c geom_gpt.c src/sys/geom/part g_part.c g_part.h g_part_apm.c g_part_gpt.c g_part_if.m src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:02:09 -0000 In message <45CA60F7.4000507@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes: >>>> Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM >>>> exclusive-use protections disappear from normal administrative >>>> activities soon, as there will now be approved channels to >>>> incrementally change the layout of in-use partition tables? >>> >>> There is already a mechanism for that. How do you think bsdlabel(8) >>> and fdisk(8) works ? >> >> I understand that. This was a pragmatic question rather than a >> philosophical question: I know it can be done, but is it now being >> done. The answer appears to be yes. > >I assume phk@ is referring to the geom debug flags sysctl. No I am not. Please read the recent thread on geom@ on this subject. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.