From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 31 10:42:50 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A95D1065679;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A078FC17;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:42:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
	[10.1.1.148])
	by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7VA6Zm4050227
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:35 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
	o7VA6ZUY018736; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:35 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: (from kostik@localhost)
	by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7VA6ZEY018735; 
	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:35 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to
	kostikbel@gmail.com using -f
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:35 +0300
From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To: gavin@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100831100635.GB2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References: <201008310921.o7V9Ljhp078995@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201008310921.o7V9Ljhp078995@freefall.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40,
	DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: standards/149980: [patch] negative value integer to
	nanosleep(2) should fail with EINVAL
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:42:50 -0000

I do think that the change is not useful. It puts more burden on the
application writers to check for the negative value before making the
syscall. Also, it changes the API.

Please, just close the PR.