From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 10:36:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F7837B401; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clever.eusc.inter.net (clever.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E429E43F3F; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:36:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from tc11-n67-096.de.inter.net ([213.73.67.96]) by clever.eusc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #4) id 19dZA3-000239-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:51 +0200 From: Matthias Schuendehuette Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200307142038.h6EKciQ06885@mailgate5.cinetic.de> <20030715090740.GA77879@phys9911.phys.tue.nl> <20030717061430.GB96381@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030717061430.GB96381@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307181936.50526.msch@snafu.de> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with new gcc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: msch@snafu.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:36:54 -0000 On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:14, David O'Brien wrote: > I'm willing to commit it as such, but I'd like to hear more people's > opinion. What I found so far: - gvim 6.2.21 works under 'twm' - gvim 6.2.21 works under 'kde 3.1' with SESSION_MANAGER unset - gvim 6.2.21 works under 'kde 3.1' if running on a remote machine tunneled through ssh's X11-redirection as reported by others: - gvim 6.2.21 works without patch 015 I looked at patch 015 but I'm not familiar with X11 SessionManagerProtocol - perhaps some others are able to analyze the correctness of that patch... -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F