From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug 19 05:21:50 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA01647
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 05:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA01642
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 05:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id FAA24472; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 05:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: itojun@itojun.org, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: another make world compile problem, the previous is fixed 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:13:18 PDT."
             <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 05:21:40 -0700
Message-ID: <24468.871993300@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  * 	I'm not familiar with /usr/src/usr.bin/vi policy, but...
>  * 	is it really necessery to compile in tcl interpreter into
>  * 	/usr/bin/vi?
>  * 	(I'm familiar with nvi itself)
> 
> IMO, no (regardless of NOTCL setting).  If people want a bloated vi
> with tcl/tk/perl/whatever support built in, they can use the ports.

Though once Peter removes TCL 7.5 from RELENG_2_2, this keyword will
be a no-op in all but -current.  Just to note it. :)

					Jordan