Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 05:21:40 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: itojun@itojun.org, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another make world compile problem, the previous is fixed Message-ID: <24468.871993300@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Aug 1997 03:13:18 PDT." <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * I'm not familiar with /usr/src/usr.bin/vi policy, but... > * is it really necessery to compile in tcl interpreter into > * /usr/bin/vi? > * (I'm familiar with nvi itself) > > IMO, no (regardless of NOTCL setting). If people want a bloated vi > with tcl/tk/perl/whatever support built in, they can use the ports. Though once Peter removes TCL 7.5 from RELENG_2_2, this keyword will be a no-op in all but -current. Just to note it. :) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24468.871993300>