From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 16:11:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F641065674 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592EE8FC17 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBF906.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.249.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q58GBeYs074575; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:11:41 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q58GBi02019663; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:11:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q58GBW0J097808; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:11:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201206081611.q58GBW0J097808@fire.js.berklix.net> To: grarpamp From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:13:45 EDT." Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:11:32 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot Specs - And some sanity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:11:49 -0000 grarpamp wrote: > Isn't there a lot of needless handwaving going on when the spec is > pretty clear that installing your own complete PKI tree will all > boil down to what is effectively a jumper on the motherboard? The hope for a jumper is insufficient. Cracking open laptops is no fun. It's not often that they unscrew easily; usually considerable fear of breaking innards or chassis. Hoping a jumper Might be under an easily unscrewable panel seems unlikely. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/