From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 19 09:20:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7894316A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714D143D1F
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i4JGKI4f053705	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4JGKIQf053704;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200405191620.i4JGKIQf053704@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Subject: Re: ports/66892: possible bug in philosophy of ports/MOVED
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:20:36 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/66892; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, dan@langille.org,
	portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/66892: possible bug in philosophy of ports/MOVED
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:15:06 +0200

 Mark Linimon wrote:
 
 > 	I guess I can work around this in portsmon ... somehow.  But
 > 	shouldn't there be some kind of notation added to MOVED when
 > 	something gets reintroduced?  (I can imagine this problem
 > 	affecting FreshPorts as well).
 
 Yep. I don't know what to check for in MOVEDlint, and I'm not sure what
 the proper semantics are: has OpenLDAP 2.0 moved to OpenLDAP 2.1, or
 is it simply deleted?
 
 We have to clarify that for MOVED to be useful for automated tools.
 
 -Oliver