From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 5 19:50:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113B216A41F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:50:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) Received: from aliencamel.com (aliencamel.com [69.93.161.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D57C43D7E for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) X-Virus-Scanned: by both ClamAV and Kaspersky at http://aliencamel.com/ Received: from [67.81.216.207] (account jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) by aliencamel.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.10) with HTTP id 20422723 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:49:57 +0000 From: "JK" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.10 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:49:57 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <43BD70ED.1000506@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Compiling Ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:50:02 -0000 On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:41:50 -0500 "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef wrote: >> Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically >>custom options >> when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 >>under it's own >> dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling my own >>version >> using the configure script I would do: >> >> ./configure prefix="/usr/local/apache22" > > I believe the default prefix can be changed, but I'm unclear as to >why > you would want to change it. The port installs a package that you >can > then remove easily with the pkg tools. Why would you want to do >this? But wait! I thought the pkg system maintained track of where things were installed even if directed somewhere else and a pkg_delete etc would still work. No?