Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:36:29 -0500 From: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: jail@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com>, Sean Chittenden <seanc@groupon.com> Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <CAHieY7R1%2BNOnQwixm-a=PAaOqR3Nf36%2Bin3ye1eixpo-DNWzNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150127012347.GA4940@lonesome.com> References: <CACfj5vKjiQHsy9VbOKFFcrBpyr3dmbkOOxTxCYhSyZrnrjRiaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA@mail.gmail.com> <20150127012347.GA4940@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > > > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is > depreciated. > > > [...] > Really the word most people use is "deprecated" rather than "depreciated". > The OP seemed well versed in the topic so I'm pretty sure the intended word was "depreciated" (twice) such as in old asset with little or residual value. My question to the OP is precisely why the choice of word how it it asserted that EzJail is in fact depreciated. Best, -- Alejandro Imass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7R1%2BNOnQwixm-a=PAaOqR3Nf36%2Bin3ye1eixpo-DNWzNA>