From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Dec  8 17:31:35 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA12119
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA12114
          for <freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:31:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA14893; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:30:54 -0800
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 17:30:54 -0800
Message-Id: <199512090130.RAA14893@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de
CC: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199512071122.MAA00477@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> (kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de)
Subject: Re: md5 checksums?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * How come that I always get wrong checksum when
 * trying to compile a port, e.g. xv-3.10a.tar.gz?

I don't know...I just ftp'd the xv tarball from the master site, it
has the correct checksum....

 * (system 2.1.0-R). Does the type of libcrypt (DES vs.
 * non-DES) count?

Shouldn't matter, it uses /sbin/md5 explicitly....

Satoshi