From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 05:16:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE68716A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russell@russellmeek.net) Received: from a.mx.russellmeek.net (91.59.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com [70.118.59.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1545943D7C for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:16:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russell@russellmeek.net) Received: (qmail 77210 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2005 05:16:01 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 75997, pid: 76431, t: 0.3952s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.87.1/m:34/d:1188 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on prometheus.russellmeek.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.172.1.125?) (russell@russellmeek.net@192.172.1.125) by a.mx.russellmeek.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Nov 2005 05:16:01 -0000 Message-ID: <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:16:04 -0500 From: "Russell E. Meek" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:16:08 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > > >>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server >>enviroment, production or non? >> >>Pros? Cons? >> >> > >This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well >to research the answer before asking :) > >It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines >with many CPUs (e.g. 12). > >Kris > > Kris, This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well to research the answer before asking :) Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions. Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to look into. so you would have done well to research the answer before asking I see you agree google.com/bsd is a trusted friend, however not much out there on performance states between 4BSD and SCHED_ULE on FreeBSD 6 Release. It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines with many CPUs (e.g. 12). That is all I needed. Thanks again for the response. Russell