Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:15:44 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fcash@sd73.bc.ca>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: rc_subr-1.31 Message-ID: <790a9fff0506131815181eed05@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050613091420.GD1789@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <1118593453.383.15.camel@xris.fu41.vpn> <60869.24.71.128.63.1118603612.squirrel@imap.sd73.bc.ca> <20050613091420.GD1789@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/13/05, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> wrote: > > > Local package initialization:Starting foo.Starting bar.Starting > > > whatever. >=20 > > > I think an output like: > > > > > Local package initialization: foo bar whatever. > > > > > ...without "Starting" for every service looks more professional. > > > > Personally, I prefer the "Starting service X" output better. > > Especially since that is what is shown when you run the RC scripts > > manually. I never liked the "foo" output when you ran the RC scripts > > manually, as it never really told you if the daemon had started, > > stopped, or errored out. Now, with the "Starting foo", "Stopping foo" > > etc, it looks more natural and is easier to understand. >=20 > It could perhaps output "Starting foo" if called outside the system > startup, and " foo" otherwise. >=20 What needs to happen is a "\n" needs to be added to "Local package initialization:", so that all of the "Starting foo" appears on seperate lines. But then we'll end up with: Local package initialization: Starting foo foo2 Starting foo3 Starting foo4 foo2 - is an old style startup script. Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0506131815181eed05>