From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 3 19:22:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from daedal.oneway.com (daedal.oneway.com [205.252.89.49]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5870F3E37 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 19:22:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jay@localhost) by daedal.oneway.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA03970 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 22:19:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 22:19:11 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: route configuration question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I have a routing problem I need some help with and I'm hoping someone can tell me how to do this. I have a server that has two connections to the internet. One is a wan link, the other is an ethernet link. Normally, I want all traffic to run through a gateway machine on the ethernet link. If, for some reason, the ethernet-gateway is unreachable (or unusable) I want the server to switch to the wan link. I do not, however, want it to inform the ethernet-gateway that it can route over the wan link. I understand that routed is probably the thing to use... but I am confused about whether I can use this without sending a notification to the ethernet gateway. Can anyone make any suggestions about how to do this? If routed is not the right thing to use, does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks very much for any help you can provide, Jay - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message