From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 23 15: 6:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8317C37B479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11666 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2000 22:06:04 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2000 22:06:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24030; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 05:05:50 +0700 Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 05:05:49 +0700 (NOVST) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Garrett Rooney Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 In-Reply-To: <20001023175332.B29365@electricjellyfish.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Garrett Rooney wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Well, would not be this stepping aside from BSD startup sequence, which we > > all know and love? Having dozens of small files instead of pair of > > big ones always frustrates me when I have to work with linux. > > well, it's a single directory full of small files, as opposed to a bunch > of directories, each with its own collection of files, with ugly numbers > at the beginning of each one. that's better in my book. > > and at the very least, with a number of smaller files, assuming they're > named well, you can find what you're looking for faster, and not have > to dig though the one monolithic script to find out how sometihng is > working. Still, it would be better if I could choose between "classical" and "new" startup layout, say, somewhere at the installation stage. -- With best and kind regards, DAN Fe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message