From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 26 12:12:33 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF21761
 for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net)
Received: from mail.dawidek.net (garage.dawidek.net [91.121.88.72])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F57ED0
 for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (58.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.58])
 by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E5D6F7;
 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:09:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:13:46 +0100
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Subject: Re: Large Capsicum patch for review.
Message-ID: <20130226121345.GB1341@garage.freebsd.pl>
References: <20130213025547.GA2025@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <20130213230221.GB1375@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <20130223221116.GR1377@garage.freebsd.pl> <5129ADC5.5040306@gmx.de>
 <512A2CA0.2050509@gmx.de> <20130224235936.GX1377@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <512B3DBB.4080909@gmx.de> <20130225215004.GA1375@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <867glvbbjz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <867glvbbjz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
X-OS: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:12:33 -0000


--l76fUT7nc3MelDdI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > I use size_t as this is preferred type for size, but I don't need size_t
> > for iterator, because I know the value will never need more than 16
> > bits, so I use int as a more CPU-friendly type.
>=20
> Using int as an iterator can lead to warnings about signedness mismatch
> in loop conditions etc., so you should at the very least use unsigned
> int. [...]

I use 'int' for 'ssize_t' and 'unsigned int' for 'size_t'.

> [...] Besides, size_t is equal to unsigned long on all platforms, so
> "CPU-friendly" is not a valid argument.

Is long more CPU-friendly than int?

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer                         http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!                     http://tupytaj.pl

--l76fUT7nc3MelDdI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEspvkACgkQForvXbEpPzSmewCgkcEYPerjF8rVacHrEtuvmhF6
P7cAoMp0Zfht4n4XpmEohu877RNbv65O
=yhfr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--l76fUT7nc3MelDdI--