Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:04:39 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        mdf@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        FreeBSD Arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Automagic SYSCTLs
Message-ID:  <86hbd2bgyw.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cbdS0g370r=X%2B=uSd0vsRdC0oRkugq-nsBpgy@mail.gmail.com> (mdf@freebsd.org's message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:12:45 -0800")
References:  <AANLkTi=cbdS0g370r=X%2B=uSd0vsRdC0oRkugq-nsBpgy@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mdf@FreeBSD.org writes:
> The gist is that the handler knows the sizeof the variable in the
> kernel and uses this to copy out.  For the case of a long, there's
> some goop for SCTL_MASK32.  For the case of 8 and 16 bit variables,
> they are still copied in and out as 32-bit quantities.

The inevitable question:

 - does this break the KBI?  (I assume it does, almost inevitably)
 - does this break the ABI?  (I hope it does not)

I'm in favor of the principle, what we have now is a mess.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbd2bgyw.fsf>