From nobody Mon Mar 9 20:01:20 2026 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fV7FG3bd9z6TrGn for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx0.riseup.net (mx0.riseup.net [198.252.153.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx0.riseup.net", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fV7FF65XXz45SC for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 20:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b="rY/CHgwV"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fV7FD2j4nz9wMq for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 20:01:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1773086496; bh=WlRcGag6ltz4GvjVO/jEYVzQRKQtWcvRwxNNq8Foy8Y=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rY/CHgwVs7nQMXcbl2TJi4lhpjgbwQO2/a3WVnXNlyTsVnN9UcPv7gSEuOPx05VHk wnmcHJq5HZzqr3ULjR6fSmecu61yevpW715VM8VOH0wXq2wAHdDjsIBj3z2j89KeqJ ncJ4U3xtRtv3EFVvykW+cf96aAudQJ4pJZPj39UU= X-Riseup-User-ID: 37EA7F9792B475EF5CC57131DCB705747563794A10FEBE41C97E22940C74AF97 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fV7F052Bfz20lD for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 20:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: parental control app for open-source desktop From: Ralf Mardorf To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 21:01:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.96 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.86)[-0.857]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mx0.riseup.net]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.6:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_HELO_LOCALHOST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[riseup.net:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4fV7FF65XXz45SC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Once again, I apologize. I am very much in favor of protecting children appropriately, but my thoughts were still on that Californian horror story. Apart from family-friendly name servers, I can't think of anything else at the moment. And even those are questionable, because they also suppress content that progressive people do not consider harmful to children. They are probably more likely Christian American fundamentalist nameservers.