Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:28 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
To:        Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au>
Cc:        appleboy.tw@gmail.com, umq@ueo.co.jp, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, cy@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Requests for port updates
Message-ID:  <201406190512.s5J5CSlV024532@slippy.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:57:20 %2B1000." <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>, Dewayne Geraghty 
writes:
> Has bugzilla taken on the role of being the repository for update
> requests?  With gnats, when the synopsis contained port information (eg
> mail\opendkim ...) the "issue" was routed directly to the maintainer. 
> If there is no auto-routing then how is a maintainer to be alerted to a
> port request - unless they happen to refer to bugzilla.
> 
> Mailing freebsd-ports just doesn't seem right... but if it is
> 
> mail/opendkim - current PORTVERSION is 2.8.3, while version 2.9.2 has
> been available since April and uses --with-lmdb
> sysutils/cfengine36 - released today.  Modified the VERSION number and
> built 3.6.0 cleanly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb)
> www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too.

Cfengine was updated about five hours ago.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201406190512.s5J5CSlV024532>