Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 21:10:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824 Message-ID: <bug-237068-29464-sYvhmgYkkL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237068 --- Comment #41 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #40) I should have noted: this is based on a gcc 4.2.1 toolchain FreeBSD context, not one of my more modern toolchain experiments. So: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.32 # /usr/bin/ld -v GNU ld 2.17.50 [FreeBSD] 2007-07-03 Thus, for example, the /lib/libncurses.so.8 in: # ldd lib/libLLVM-6.0.so lib/libLLVM-6.0.so: libncurses.so.8 =3D> /lib/libncurses.so.8 (0x41e00000) libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x41862000) was not produced by the more modern ld : # /usr/local/bin/ld -v GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.32 but /lib/libncurses.so.8 was used by 2.32 in forming lib/libLLVM-6.0.so . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237068-29464-sYvhmgYkkL>