Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:04 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: appleboy.tw@gmail.com, umq@ueo.co.jp, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Cy Schubert <cy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Requests for port updates Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmqrXnetEZpg04tDc71r4jFoFCiF-t6PpPC7CHZZ97xtA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au> References: <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 June 2014 21:57, Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> wrote: > Has bugzilla taken on the role of being the repository for update > requests? Update requests should never have existed in GNATS and should not be in bugzilla unless they have a patch attached. (note: this refers only to update requests and not to bug reports). > With gnats, when the synopsis contained port information (eg > mail\opendkim ...) the "issue" was routed directly to the maintainer. > If there is no auto-routing then how is a maintainer to be alerted to a > port request - unless they happen to refer to bugzilla. There will be auto-routing - it just isn't in place yet. > mail/opendkim - current PORTVERSION is 2.8.3, while version 2.9.2 has > been available since April and uses --with-lmdb > sysutils/cfengine36 - released today. Modified the VERSION number and > built 3.6.0 cleanly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb) > www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too. portscout is supposed to take this role. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmqrXnetEZpg04tDc71r4jFoFCiF-t6PpPC7CHZZ97xtA>