From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 14 08:14:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC0116A41C
	for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:14:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF043D4C
	for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:14:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5E8EVTa039670
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:14:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5E8EV1I039669
	for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:14:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org
	using -f
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20050614070006.GA27141@dragon.NUXI.org>
References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456EA37@VIP10-WIN2K>
	<1118670027.59181.32.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20050613120414.V65109@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<200506132356.01937.groot@kde.org>
	<1118701494.34657.8.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<20050614070006.GA27141@dragon.NUXI.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR"
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:14:31 +0200
Message-Id: <1118736871.39418.14.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:14:34 -0000


--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

David O'Brien p=ED=B9e v =FAt 14. 06. 2005 v 00:00 -0700:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:24:54AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > I think NIC and RAID columns are a bit overkill
>=20
> Why?  Those two devices are the ones most likely to give trouble - after
> basic booting.

Agreed. Any problems encountered with them should be of course noted in
Notes column, and their device nodes/drivers can be read from dmesgs.

And of course, I'm lazy boy and as such oppose any change that would
bring me a lot of work :)

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Me go and see Elves and all! Hooray!

--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCrpHnntdYP8FOsoIRAskrAKCnm/IB6JT35UV/Ao1C4K6JFXwd9wCgohRO
X/xO1vLTBlTWoRKGUymR/QE=
=9rmU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-XZjjUnNFQxD4g9EDeXCR--