From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 19:34:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE30106568B; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF868FC12; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBIJSTxT095237; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:28:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20091218.122857.59640143227132198.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <868wd0cyjd.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200912161717.nBGHHeQZ005541@svn.freebsd.org> <200912161541.53834.jhb@freebsd.org> <868wd0cyjd.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200606 - in head/sys: compat/freebsd32 sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:34:27 -0000 In message: <868wd0cyjd.fsf@ds4.des.no> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: : John Baldwin writes: : > Warner Losh writes: : > > Log: : > > Fix compiling FREEBSD_COMPAT[4,5,6] without FREEBSD_COMPAT7. : > > = : > > Note: Not sure this is the right way to do compat, but it makes= the : > > headers consistent with the implementations. : > Please revert. I think this has already been reverted once before.= : = : Yep, that was me... we concluded back then that this is a perfectly : reasonable dependency; perhaps we should simply add the appropriate : #ifndef / #error constructs so you can't define FREEBSD_COMPAT(n) : without FREEBSD_COMPAT(n+1). I'll take care of that... Warner