From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 03:10:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3F937B404 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 03:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E4A43FEC for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4BAADUp035910 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4BAADLC035909; Sun, 11 May 2003 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305111010.h4BAADLC035909@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Antoine Jacoutot Subject: Re: ports/48812: New port: print/foomatic-db-engine X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Antoine Jacoutot List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 10:10:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/48812; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Antoine Jacoutot To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, gasp@ridcully.dnsalias.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/48812: New port: print/foomatic-db-engine Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 12:07:38 +0200 Hey... I can't wait for this port to be included in the ports tree. Do you know when this could happen ? Now, I have a question: - why is cups.2:${PORTSDIR}/print/cups-base needed ? Isn't foomatic supposed to work with LPD too ? I think you should make cups support an option (something like "if defined WITH_CUPS=yes..."). Thanks for porting this application. Antoine