From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 13:05:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0949F16A4CF for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 13:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABABA43D5E for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (e932bacf50d57e178a70166119e35030@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4DK5jNu014945; Thu, 13 May 2004 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCFF851BB5; Thu, 13 May 2004 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:05:45 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Shaun T. Erickson" Message-ID: <20040513200545.GB8931@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <40A3CBB8.1090202@smxy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40A3CBB8.1090202@smxy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: chkrootkit says 'date' is infected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 20:05:52 -0000 --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:25:44PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > I just installed and ran the chkrootkit port on my 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5=20 > system. It says my date command is infected. Nothing else, just that.=20 > How can I determine if this is a false positive or if I'm truly hacked? Talk to the chkrootkit developers. Their tool provides so many false positives that they're the ones who should be bearing the responsibility for dealing with user confusion :) Kris --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAo9UZWry0BWjoQKURAvNQAKDjOLzICVsbxwpKAjPCS6tNh295bgCfdEUo eLaABPsRCA7AhReuhOYnybM= =47Dl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--