Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 20:18:36 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com> To: ponds!lambert.org!terry, ponds!uunet.uu.net!ponds!ponds!rivers Cc: ponds!uunet.uu.net!ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers, ponds!uunet.uu.net!ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!rivers, ponds!uunet.uu.net!ponds!lambert.org!terry Subject: Re: daily panics - the saga continues... Message-ID: <199611160118.UAA23050@lakes.water.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> > Sounds like a reasonable explanation.... but...
> >
> > In the 2.1.5R and 2.1.5-STABLE code, there is no call to
> > simple_unlock(&vnode_free_list_slock) - in fact, there is no
> > simple_unlock() in the entire kern sub-directory...
> >
> > I think there's some 2.1.5 vs. -current confusion?
>
> Shit. My local machine has BSD4.4-Lite2 integrated... sorry. 8-(.
>
> Which code, exactly, are you running?
2.1.5-STABLE as of Oct. 17th.
>
> > if (freevnodes < (numvnodes >> 2) ||
> > numvnodes < desiredvnodes ||
> > ! vp == NULL || /* list empty */
> > ! vp->v_usecount) /* queue wrapped */
> > ! {
>
> For your code, this might need to be:
>
> > if (freevnodes < (numvnodes >> 2) ||
> > numvnodes < desiredvnodes ||
> > ! vp == NULL || /* list empty */
> > ! (vp->v_usecount && vp->v_usage == 0)) /* queue wrapped */
> > ! {
>
> Damn, I'm getting old.
>
Ok, I'll bite - just how old is old? :-)
- Dave R. -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611160118.UAA23050>