From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 13:46:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDF216A407 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD1943D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:46:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.172]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k8UDkCL9051794; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:46:22 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GTfA4-0000Er-Rg; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:45:48 +0400 To: Divacky Roman References: <20060929150435.GA27118@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <37304031@bsam.ru> <20060930081443.GA68123@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:45:48 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060930081443.GA68123@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:14:43 +0200") Message-ID: <69458067@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 TLS implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:46:31 -0000 On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:14:43 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > I uploaded new patch.. the previous one contained obvious bug ;( > now I hope it might work... pls test again (the patch is exactly > the same just in one place I put td2 instead of td) > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/amd64-tls.patch > the patch might contain some other changes because I genereate that > via p4 diff2 and then edit by hand. But I am sure you will cope with > that :) Assuming new files are needed (linux_aio.c, linux_aio.h) as well as patches for conf/files.amd64 and conf/files.i386, the kernel builds successfully. But chrooting segfaults. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve