From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 15 21:22:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0674316A474 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E3243D7F for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:21:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060C8D6CD17 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:21:59 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: pb5U6QmRner1Lp+vF2z+hZOXYBin8xzEznEmNHG5/rWb 1150406519 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1867017 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:21:59 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:21:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <4491B615.1080704@gregs-garage.com> <4491B9DD.6090707@gregs-garage.com> <20060615160250.a52d37c6.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060615160250.a52d37c6.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606152221.53951.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: clarification of cvsup process. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:22:07 -0000 On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:02, Bill Moran wrote: > Are you sure you completed the process successfully? If you'd had > tag=., this would reports something like 6-STABLE. If you'd had > 6_0_RELENG, it would report 6.0-RELEASE-p9. Surely tag=. is 7-CURRENT, not 6-STABLE. Or am I missing something?