Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0400
From:      Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@gmail.com>
To:        PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: (ANother) stall fixed, please update to HEAD
Message-ID:  <CAKZxVQXEDAD8KtR2%2B3TgxYEbGkuObahfOz8KoG76swO4F%2BQvKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFZ_MYL%2BPJp=fZGY3HUuL%2BLtMGh1QaAMrEZsoig5sKoV=ESs=w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAFZ_MYL%2BPJp=fZGY3HUuL%2BLtMGh1QaAMrEZsoig5sKoV=ESs=w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> iter.path only print outs debug message when the array overflowed
> (most unlikely it will). At this moment, this is what we need.
>
> iter2.patch does iter.patch + revert changes + abort iterating just
> for piece of mind. Probably this is unnecessary. The code need to be
> patched in the way the array won't overflow if it ever happens. (I
> leave it to committers what to commit.)
>
> The attached patch can be applied over iter.patch
>
> Sorry for the confusion.

Its no problem, applied iter + addon and rebuilding now, thanks for
doing this :)

thanks
-kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKZxVQXEDAD8KtR2%2B3TgxYEbGkuObahfOz8KoG76swO4F%2BQvKQ>