From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 9 11:51:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30C3106566B for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w8hdkim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D658FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbgb22 with SMTP id gb22so344429vcb.13 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bWyFFcTVIH2S+DkkHyWHAkaZUFwx2F31sBLvS/MJFK8=; b=E5j0eBxmNrvrK1IggGRE52wB4TT/Bz7qfRlXJSA7q0nS9YLglqgrKhmxEcm3KrS7Rn eWx5s0fcdUmn4b3Vyu3G77ZUyNW30lNI/Nw9bsEmck1ssiMHVAU6KKxqg5C5Q+M9X0He 1sbHr0Z1jdW+3ACD+CJeBt2stnIBZYOkMQK8IzsFFRbUYFkWuBHbVJiJfwl3nSPVaxre sYDbhZ/GHkg8orFAp3NO+KW/rhWirrikcMhq0fen76g6Wt+aJhEBlZ0shliyfm0bRn6/ kZ7voMjk/ZGOf5IGSeWifYxCi65cJ/hfOOxFUUcfQ35QZBOVWrOFlB5I+a9w70j7YtFN tPgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.33.234 with SMTP id u10mr18751187vei.49.1344513070659; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.35.17 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kim Culhan To: PseudoCylon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (ANother) stall fixed, please update to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:51:12 -0000 On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, PseudoCylon wrote: > iter.path only print outs debug message when the array overflowed > (most unlikely it will). At this moment, this is what we need. > > iter2.patch does iter.patch + revert changes + abort iterating just > for piece of mind. Probably this is unnecessary. The code need to be > patched in the way the array won't overflow if it ever happens. (I > leave it to committers what to commit.) > > The attached patch can be applied over iter.patch > > Sorry for the confusion. Its no problem, applied iter + addon and rebuilding now, thanks for doing this :) thanks -kim