From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 17:42:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106FC16A421 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmealins@supfoo.org) Received: from gray.brainflux.net (ns.rudholm.com [205.196.209.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CEF43D46 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:42:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmealins@supfoo.org) Received: by gray.brainflux.net (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 45EC51CC4009; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:42:02 -0700 From: Jason Mealins To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050921174202.GB17620@supfoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Subject: cpu HAMMER option in GENERIC kernel... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:42:03 -0000 I have been testing 5.4-RELEASE-p7 on a couple of PowerEdge 2850's with xeons(nocona) in them and I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing any sort of NOCONA cpu option. After digging around in the source tree I couldn't find any evidence to the contrary but I figured it would be worth a shot to ask. Thanks! jason