From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov  9 08:59:18 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AED16A417
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2007 08:59:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725D913C48E
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2007 08:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1IqP8U-000JI7-R8
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:22:42 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:22:42 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1IqP8U-000JI7-R8@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: bge/ilo blues on Sun X2200 (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:59:18 -0000

trying my luck here :-)

newer kernels (after Oct. 20) are breacking bge.
i've checked the cvsdiffs, but nothing seems relevant.

the ilo (Integrated Lights Out) port, bge1, though not configured, gets
configured to 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex>, and no magic will
get it to 100/full-duplex, which is what the ilo was/is using.

this works fine on an Oct 20 system.

any ideas?

cheers,
	danny