Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:11:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220696] [NEW PORT] sysutils/py-filelock: Platform independent file lock Message-ID: <bug-220696-13-HJ0EJUNj1a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220696-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220696-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220696 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(yuri@r | |awbw.com) Keywords| |feature, needs-qa CC| |python@FreeBSD.org, | |yuri@rawbw.com --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thank you Yuri. The port specifies USES=3Dpython, but setup.py states (notably *without* a = ":: 2" counterpart): "Programming Language :: Python :: 3", Further, in the documentation installation instructions, pip3 (specifically= ) is cited for installation, hinting strongly that only Python 3 is supported, o= r at least preferred by the developer Please investigate the actual versions the package supports and and declare/limit USES=3Dpython to all versions of Python that are supported by upstream. Also, in future if more detail could be added about what has been tested / confirmed to pass QA with poudriere, that would be appreciated. What versio= ns, architectures, options, etc.=20 For Python package ports, testing with at least Python 2 and 3 versions for dual version supporting packages is highly desirable. [1] https://filelock.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220696-13-HJ0EJUNj1a>