From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 17:16:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73540B90; Mon, 25 May 2015 17:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D06BBB9; Mon, 25 May 2015 17:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (pool-173-54-116-245.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.54.116.245]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3ABFB915; Mon, 25 May 2015 13:16:21 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Slawa Olhovchenkov Cc: Chagin Dmitry , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64 Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:32:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 25 May 2015 13:16:22 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:16:23 -0000 On Monday, May 25, 2015 06:13:39 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:40:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Some other related questions are: can we revive print/acroread now and or > > use a 64-bit flash plugin after these changes? > > I am still use print/acroread. > As I know removing print/acroread irrelevant to linuxator. > This is will by security reasson. > I am don't open suspicious pdf from suspicious source and just ignore > this removing. I mean more if these updates allow us to update to a newer version of print/acroread that would no longer be vulnerable (if such a thing exists) whether 32- or 64-bit. -- John Baldwin