From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 16 07:11:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA20030 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 07:11:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA20021 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 07:11:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA18803 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:06:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:06:54 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Hovey To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Sendmail/smapd question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I use smapd to keep out as much spammage as possible. Lately I hav encountered 2 sites who cannot send email here, because their emailers will only do ESMTP and not regular SMTP which smapd is only capable of. Could this be some sendmail.cf jobber on their end which is causing this? ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Hovey Chief Engineer BuffNET More Than Just a Connection! ------------------------------------------------------------------