From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 11:20:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE41065698 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19688FC18 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oABBK5Km088494 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oABBK5YA088493; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:05 GMT Message-Id: <201011111120.oABBK5YA088493@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Loic Pefferkorn Cc: Subject: Re: ports/149725: [patch] devel/cdk: Errors in examples of cdk_display(3) man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Loic Pefferkorn List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:20:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/149725; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Loic Pefferkorn To: Stefan Walter Cc: GNATS Subject: Re: ports/149725: [patch] devel/cdk: Errors in examples of cdk_display(3) man page Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:56:14 +0100 Le 11/11/2010 09:31, Stefan Walter a écrit : > Hi Loic, > > the man page you sent the patch for is part of the cdk distribution. IMHO, > instead of adding the patch to the FreeBSD port, it should be sent to the > upstream maintainer (see http://invisible-island.net/cdk/) to be > reviewed/incorporated there. > > Please let me know if there are reasons to add it to the FreeBSD port only > or if this PR should be closed. > > Regards, > Stefan > Hello Stefan, I also sent the path upstream at the same time, the author told me he will have a look, but it didn't happened yet. I have created this PR so people could have a correct documentation until next upstream release. (and save hours wondering why the examples don't work) Maybe you can still patch the port, until further upstream release correct it ? Regards, Loïc