From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:20:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA2D2A6; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4FE9A1; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so120907wgh.0; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:20:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9r6ktYZMB825XwgV16cG5DAsX4PuJcA15SRed+VWlGo=; b=DqQQTZMkBsVg2Vg1X1RzZZNOGsnE2hUgrJ6FaK6sSSc9xRNa7/H4NoNieNe0EfVpha vGJqGfPZExbDaDuF8vaYevOmw94dN60wW92ruHhnRquelQ2TnR4mPNJ4Akh9qONzcFCi fKtqEGT6+3MS+jTtvz+1ns+VMVYoHGVfEU/6BBDpOq6SlJ2jtLPleucIzUx/eF45Uozj Pc+lNNXJxOdhupnwVUQModVM/6XiR68yAGf1cMasqEALzU6UBohG78+yFr2fHckOKbtM WZUzAHLdNsmivdjgvPyla0f7Jkqj9obI0Q3rJXQ0pHGv7wWNO5nk2ZJ74MUImARhrCW0 EvyA== X-Received: by 10.180.97.2 with SMTP id dw2mr348731wib.6.1423610409090; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qg4sm15173707wic.13.2015.02.10.15.20.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:20:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:20:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Chris H Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150210232005.GW29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:20:11 -0000 --L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:13:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin = wrote >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for= that > > I want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove th= e old > > make from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > Please note; I am not expressing any objection to it's removal. > But would a 30-day window not be a more friendly. So as to better > accommodate those whom will need to make the/a transition? >=20 What transition, since 10.0 noone have fmake by default anymore? if one wan= t to keep using fmake he has to explicitly state it when building. Not that I'm against a 30-day windows but that does not seems worth it. Best regards, Bapt --L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTakiUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ewx6ACglQ89WgR+Z4IUxkNVqpX74ocB 874AnRLjn6Ic4AjVdFtI0uct7kdSRu27 =RUMM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc--