From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 13:00:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AD2106566C for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.junus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9018FC12 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so2212101yen.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of i.junus@gmail.com designates 10.236.184.167 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.184.167; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of i.junus@gmail.com designates 10.236.184.167 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=i.junus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=i.junus@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.184.167]) by 10.236.184.167 with SMTP id s27mr33891904yhm.8.1331038829461 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:00:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eic/MwKlUBm7TH+MyO71iAcr4OTKB/VWKn0U+cTKik0=; b=NsoGhNAklKC2DQjCxwU0tgzF96iP+g0aNP+U4EKxCbFUrEZDxnekfZ1Wo5f48uRXSa rjh9+6yoyuSsGW+y1cbQt657hIIMrNeOqTnhDjMqhIkQZ4Ulzjq1wrdBX0ySMIG/tYrX FVldlN1Ke4eTd/5+rhBGnfXXjthlt4dmpbhNGRWaVV8g3rjjLSeWA5dUO37U3W9/sOoW Cz/DjfUguI+VE1ruCe6iRYPXqctIhQWa7njiDwwJnVBdr0WnRHXFfMx7/AZmjfHUNQ3F 0lb42i2OMmbnealJL7Z+p2+bjm2HEubmIYAVuK5ePlN4ngjHa2bPXInxWV4Q0YoMuQS7 LrUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.167 with SMTP id s27mr26785244yhm.8.1331038829392; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.42.6 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 05:00:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vcmjap5s.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm> References: <87vcmjap5s.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:00:29 +0800 Message-ID: From: Irjohn Junus To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel(R) PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter not working properly X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:00:32 -0000 Thanks Herbert. I bought another Intel CT to test and it work flawlessly, so it was a bad PT adapter. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:39:01 +0800 > Irjohn Junus wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This was originally posted here: > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=168854&posted=1#post168854 > > > > I'm building a new PF firewall box based on FreeBSD 9 Release. > Motherboard > > is Foxconn H61S Mini-ITX with Intel PRO/1000 PT dual port server adapter. > > > > The adapter is recognized as em0 and em1 but em0 just won't work (i.e no > > light on the port when connected to the switch) and em1 works only in > > 100baseTX full-duplex mode (no carrier if I force it to 1000baseT). I > tried > > to change switch port, UTP cable from Cat5e to Cat6 but still no luck. > The > > onboard Realtek works fine. Switch is Netgear GS608. Could it be a bad > > Intel card? > > > > I also tried to compile the latest driver from Intel but it gives error > > during compilation: > > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/conf...&Dwnldid=17509< > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/confirm.aspx?httpDown=http://downloadmirror.intel.com/17509/eng/em-7.2.4.tar.gz&lang=eng&Dwnldid=17509 > > > > > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! > > > > ps: command captures are provided at the url above. > > Maybe you should test with 8.3-BETA1. The recent em1000 drivers (7.3.0?) > were mfc'ed to stable/8 January 31st but not to stable/9. > > See: > > > > > -- > Herbert >