From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 21:58:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F5758C; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4EF229; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910D533C1D; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:58:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3CADB39822; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:58:11 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Andre Goree Subject: Re: Build of "telepathy-glib" fails References: <20141203085632.0ba07b59@scorpio> <44sigwh70h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <8809147fc4de7b88e4c71e2fb3368b5c@drenet.net> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:58:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8809147fc4de7b88e4c71e2fb3368b5c@drenet.net> (Andre Goree's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:25:51 -0500") Message-ID: <44k328gzv0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, kwm@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:58:24 -0000 Andre Goree writes: > On 12/03/2014 2:23 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Andre Goree writes: >> >>> FWIW, I've also seen this. Like someone else mentioned, I think it >>> has to do with the vala install, which I haven't been able to update >>> either because according to /usr/ports/UPDATING I need to install >>> gnome3 to update it, which I find to be ludicrous. >> >> You are misunderstanding the instructions. >> >> If you aren't using Gnome, it's quite possible that nothing on your >> system depends on vala, so the "users of vala" description wouldn't >> apply to you. Assuming that it is in fact a leaf node, updating (or >> removing) it is fine and doesn't even require any special instructions. >> >> telepathy-glib has a runtime dependency on vala, but you'll probably >> still be fine doing a normal upgrade of both. > > Unfortunately: > > root@daemon2 ~ # pkg remove vala > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 9 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > vala-0.20.1_1 > vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > telepathy-glib-0.20.2_1 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > telepathy-farsight-0.0.19_2 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > telepathy-qt4-0.9.3_1 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > krfb-4.14.2 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > kdenetwork-4.14.2 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > kde-4.14.2 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > krdc-4.14.2 (depends on vala-0.20.1_1) > > and even: > > root@daemon2 ~ # pkg remove vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1 > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 8 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1 > telepathy-glib-0.20.2_1 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > telepathy-farsight-0.0.19_2 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > telepathy-qt4-0.9.3_1 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > krfb-4.14.2 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > kdenetwork-4.14.2 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > kde-4.14.2 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > krdc-4.14.2 (depends on vala-vapigen-0.20.1_1) > > > I do indeed use kde4 on this box. You could check with whoever wrote that UPDATING entry. At the very worst, you'll have to do something along the lines of "pkg delete vala-vapigen" followed by a "pkg add x11/kde" (or some equivalent like building the port instead of the "pkg add"). In other words, follow the instructions as listed but replace "gnome3" with "kde4". That would be my recommendation. I suppose the UPDATING entry could be corrected to cover anything that gets deinstalled by the "pkg delete" bits of the procedure, not just gnome.