From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:59:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7090016A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:59:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C317E43D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 90775 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 20:59:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NOuIVqolNPZD1fnGnFn/qRyrv3eNV7wan50MaMKCtnmbjANTVcX3Z95JOUWrJvk7xeXAd20rK4DD4LDkkQBi+0FzVGlXP03PU7ZFpCKpgDiLWNhc5n9VcwUPHFaRlwUI+IjamNAPx+o9UpMWpcFwESbb5B4pDmufGdtxl4GOEL4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.199?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.81 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 20:59:28 -0000 Message-ID: <436E6EBD.6070408@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:59:41 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Meyer References: <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <1131176568.3960.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GNOME 2.12.1 has been merged into the ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:59:29 -0000 Dirk Meyer wrote: > Jeremy Messenger schrieb:, > > >> But, we will accept any patch that fix for FreeBSD 4.x as long it doesn't >> break with FreeBSD 5.x, 6.x and 7.x. There is no reason to keep FreeBSD >> 4.x for desktop. >> > > Well well, hold the horses .... > There are still a dozens regression in 5.x > - some hardware does not boot 5.x > - vimum/gvinum ist not working with 4.x volumes > - and performaces is a nightmare on atapi harddisks > - em0 gigabit ethernet solws down to 40kb/s > - yacc is broken in the base. > ... and more to detect > > So far about 11 of 30 istalled machines were broken on update. > > Keep in mind that 5.4 was the first "stable" release of 5.x. > But it has not reached the quality of 4.x > Have you tried 6?