From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jul 14 23:31:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp (decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp [133.27.84.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1998637C3F5; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:31:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from say@sfc.wide.ad.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost.sfc.keio.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17232; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:31:04 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from say@sfc.wide.ad.jp) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: silby@silby.com, lconrad@Go2France.com, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) From: ARIGA Seiji In-Reply-To: References: <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-PGP-Publickey: http://decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~say/key.txt X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8E 70 AB 20 44 E6 8A 8A 1C 49 B3 30 44 1B B3 BA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000715153103V.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:31:03 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133) Lines: 15 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:02:40 -0500 (CDT), Mike Silbersack wrote, : > TCP STREAM TEST UDP STREAM TEST : > NONE: 60Mbps NONE: 94Mbps : > AH: 23Mbps AH: 30Mbps : > ESP: 11Mbps ESP: 11Mbps : > AH+ESP: 8Mbps AH+ESP: 9Mbps : Question. Is the time spent in the IPSec layer accounted to the user : processor, or just thrown in with kernel time? I used netperf to measure the performance of IPsec. So, I think it is accounted to the user processor. // ARIGA Seiji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message